Agentic AI Systems and Financial Stability: From Model Risk to Systemic Risk
ORIGINAL / Agentic AI Systems and Financial Stability, From Model Risk to Systemic Risk
Formalizes the systemic risk of agentic AI across six mathematical settings: from an expected-harm identity for expected loss and the non-diversifiable common exposure of a shared foundation model to an observability trichotomy and runtime-impossibility corollary for runtime guardrails, arguing the systematic component of agentic risk cannot be diversified away, detected away, or reversed and can only be met by ex-ante structural prevention.
01 ABSTRACT
This work argues that when many decision-makers depend on the same infrastructure, distress is no longer approximately idiosyncratic and diversifiable, so the binding concern shifts from the model risk of a single deployment to the systemic risk of the population. The authors formalize this across six mathematical settings: a shared foundation model is a non-diversifiable common exposure whose expected-shortfall floor does not vanish as the fleet grows, and a percolation threshold governs contagion. The authors' central claim is that the systematic component of agentic risk cannot be diversified away, detected away, or reversed, and only ex-ante structural prevention moves it.
02 KEY FINDINGS
- A shared foundation model is a non-diversifiable common exposure whose expected-shortfall floor persists as the fleet grows, with a percolation threshold governing contagion.
- Under a lever-assignment axiom that review cannot intercept an irreversible action, no non-preventive control satisfies a coherent tail constraint.
- Modeling runtime guardrails as partially observed stochastic control yields an observability trichotomy, a detection floor, and, under commit exogeneity, a runtime-impossibility corollary.
AI GENERATED SUMMARY / DISCOVERED BY ARXIV Q-FIN